BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q vs Philips 498P9Z
BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSPhilips 498P9Z
48.8″ · 5120×1440 · 165 Hz · VABenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q and Philips 498P9Z are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.
- Resolution: Philips 498P9Z leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Response time: BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q
If you care most about response time.
Philips 498P9Z
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q | Philips 498P9Z | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 75 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 48.8″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $270 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q or Philips 498P9Z better?
BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q and Philips 498P9Z are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75. Resolution: Philips 498P9Z leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Response time: BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).