Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR

27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel50
Response time90
VS
Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON 315QHD165

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time30
Verdict

ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.

  • Response time: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this

ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QRCorsair XENEON 315QHD165
70Gear score70
27″Screen size31.5″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
165 HzRefresh rate165 Hz
TNPanelIPS
1 msResponse time8 ms
—Estimated price≈ $350

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR or Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 better?

ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Response time: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).

Similar comparisons

ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR vs ASUS ROG Strix XG248QASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR vs BenQ EX2780QCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs ASUS ROG Strix XG248QCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs BenQ EX2780QCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs BenQ XL2540