ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ vs Philips Evnia 27M2C5200W
ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ
64.5″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · VAPhilips Evnia 27M2C5200W
27″ · 1920×1080 · 280 Hz · VAASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ and Philips Evnia 27M2C5200W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2C5200W leads (280 Hz vs 144 Hz).
ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ
If you care most about resolution.
Philips Evnia 27M2C5200W
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ | Philips Evnia 27M2C5200W | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 64.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 280 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ or Philips Evnia 27M2C5200W better?
ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ and Philips Evnia 27M2C5200W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2C5200W leads (280 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 27M2C5200W leads (280 Hz vs 144 Hz).