ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM vs Samsung CHG90
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 280 Hz · TNSamsung CHG90
49″ · 3840×1080 · 144 Hz · VAASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM and Samsung CHG90 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: Samsung CHG90 leads (3840×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Samsung CHG90
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM | Samsung CHG90 | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×1080 |
| 280 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM or Samsung CHG90 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM and Samsung CHG90 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: Samsung CHG90 leads (3840×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 144 Hz).