MSI G273CQ vs Samsung CHG90
Samsung CHG90
49″ · 3840×1080 · 144 Hz · VAMSI G273CQ and Samsung CHG90 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: Samsung CHG90 leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI G273CQ leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
MSI G273CQ
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung CHG90
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI G273CQ | Samsung CHG90 | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×1080 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $160 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI G273CQ or Samsung CHG90 better?
MSI G273CQ and Samsung CHG90 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: Samsung CHG90 leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI G273CQ leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G273CQ leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).