ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 310 Hz · Fast IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 240 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (0.3 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A | Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 79 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 310 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A or Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 240 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (0.3 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (310 Hz vs 240 Hz).