ASUS TUF Gaming VG30VQL1A vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
ASUS TUF Gaming VG30VQL1A
29.5″ · 2560×1080 · 200 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG30VQL1A and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG30VQL1A leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG30VQL1A
If you care most about refresh rate.
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG30VQL1A | Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 29.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 200 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 8 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $350 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG30VQL1A or Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG30VQL1A and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG30VQL1A leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG30VQL1A leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).