BenQ EX270QM vs Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ
BenQ EX270QM
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSGigabyte AORUS CO49DQ
49″ · 5120×1440 · 144 Hz · OLEDBenQ EX270QM and Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 83 and 84.
- Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: BenQ EX270QM leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (0.03 ms vs 1 ms).
BenQ EX270QM
If you care most about refresh rate.
Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ EX270QM | Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 83 | Gear score | 84 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| ≈ $400 | Estimated price | ≈ $890 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ EX270QM or Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ better?
BenQ EX270QM and Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 83 and 84. Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: BenQ EX270QM leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ leads (0.03 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ EX270QM leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: BenQ EX270QM ≈ $400, Gigabyte AORUS CO49DQ ≈ $890. Current prices vary by store.