Monitors / Comparison
BenQ EX2780Q vs Samsung CJ890
Monitor · BenQ
BenQ EX2780Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSVery good
Refresh rate62
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung CJ890
49″ · 3840×1080 · 144 Hz · VAVery good
Refresh rate62
Resolution83
Panel66
Verdict
BenQ EX2780Q and Samsung CJ890 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Samsung CJ890 leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440).
Pick this
Samsung CJ890
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ EX2780Q | Samsung CJ890 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ EX2780Q or Samsung CJ890 better?
BenQ EX2780Q and Samsung CJ890 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Samsung CJ890 leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440).
Similar comparisons
BenQ EX2780Q vs BenQ XL2540BenQ EX2780Q vs BenQ XL2546BenQ EX2780Q vs BenQ XL2740BenQ EX2780Q vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165BenQ EX2780Q vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVSamsung CJ890 vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165Samsung CJ890 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVSamsung CJ890 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVSamsung CJ890 vs ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q