Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs Samsung CJ890

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV

27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung CJ890

49″ · 3840×1080 · 144 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution83
Panel66
Verdict

ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and Samsung CJ890 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.

  • Resolution: Samsung CJ890 leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440).
Pick this

Samsung CJ890

If you care most about resolution.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVSamsung CJ890
70Gear score70
27″Screen size49″
2560×1440Resolution3840×1080
144 HzRefresh rate144 Hz
IPSPanelVA
5 msResponse time—
≈ $359Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV or Samsung CJ890 better?

ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and Samsung CJ890 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Samsung CJ890 leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440).

Similar comparisons

ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs ASUS ROG Strix XG248QASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs ASUS ROG Strix XG258QASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs BenQ EX2780QSamsung CJ890 vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165Samsung CJ890 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVSamsung CJ890 vs ASUS ROG Strix XG248QSamsung CJ890 vs BenQ EX2780Q