Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Samsung CJ890
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSSamsung CJ890
49″ · 3840×1080 · 144 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Samsung CJ890 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Samsung CJ890 leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung CJ890
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | Samsung CJ890 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Samsung CJ890 better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Samsung CJ890 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Samsung CJ890 leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).