BenQ XL2546 vs Cooler Master Tempest GP2711
BenQ XL2546
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNCooler Master Tempest GP2711
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · QD-VABenQ XL2546 and Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ XL2546 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ XL2546 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
BenQ XL2546
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Cooler Master Tempest GP2711
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ XL2546 | Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| TN | Panel | QD-VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $333 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ XL2546 or Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 better?
BenQ XL2546 and Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Cooler Master Tempest GP2711 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ XL2546 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: BenQ XL2546 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ XL2546 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).