Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Dell Alienware AW3420DW
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSDell Alienware AW3420DW
34.1″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Dell Alienware AW3420DW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Dell Alienware AW3420DW leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Dell Alienware AW3420DW leads (2 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Dell Alienware AW3420DW
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | Dell Alienware AW3420DW | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 34.1″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 8 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | ≈ $630 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Dell Alienware AW3420DW better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Dell Alienware AW3420DW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Dell Alienware AW3420DW leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Dell Alienware AW3420DW leads (2 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 ≈ $350, Dell Alienware AW3420DW ≈ $630. Current prices vary by store.