Monitors / Comparison

Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Dell S2417DG

Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON 315QHD165

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time30
VS
Monitor · Dell

Dell S2417DG

23.8″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel50
Response time90
Verdict

Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Dell S2417DG are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.

  • Response time: Dell S2417DG leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this

Dell S2417DG

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Corsair XENEON 315QHD165Dell S2417DG
70Gear score70
31.5″Screen size23.8″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
165 HzRefresh rate165 Hz
IPSPanelTN
8 msResponse time1 ms
≈ $350Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Dell S2417DG better?

Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Dell S2417DG are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Response time: Dell S2417DG leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).

Similar comparisons

Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs ASUS ROG Strix XG248QCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs BenQ EX2780QCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs BenQ XL2540Dell S2417DG vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGVDell S2417DG vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVDell S2417DG vs ASUS ROG Strix XG248QDell S2417DG vs BenQ EX2780Q