Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Monoprice 40776
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSMonoprice 40776
34″ · 3440×1440 · 144 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Monoprice 40776 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Monoprice 40776 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Monoprice 40776 leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Monoprice 40776
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | Monoprice 40776 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Monoprice 40776 better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Monoprice 40776 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Monoprice 40776 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Monoprice 40776 leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).