Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs MSI MAG 27C6PF
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 27C6PF
27″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and MSI MAG 27C6PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 69.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 27C6PF leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 27C6PF leads (0.5 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 27C6PF
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | MSI MAG 27C6PF | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 69 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or MSI MAG 27C6PF better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and MSI MAG 27C6PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 69. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 27C6PF leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 27C6PF leads (0.5 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 27C6PF leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).