Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Nixeus NX-EDG34S
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSNixeus NX-EDG34S
34″ · 3440×1440 · 144 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Nixeus NX-EDG34S are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Nixeus NX-EDG34S leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Nixeus NX-EDG34S leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Nixeus NX-EDG34S
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | Nixeus NX-EDG34S | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Nixeus NX-EDG34S better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Nixeus NX-EDG34S are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Nixeus NX-EDG34S leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Nixeus NX-EDG34S leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).