Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Samsung LC32G55TQWNXZA
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Samsung LC32G55TQWNXZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | Samsung LC32G55TQWNXZA | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | — |
| 8 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | ≈ $290 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Samsung LC32G55TQWNXZA better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Samsung LC32G55TQWNXZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 ≈ $350, Samsung LC32G55TQWNXZA ≈ $290. Current prices vary by store.