Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs ViewSonic XG2560
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSViewSonic XG2560
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and ViewSonic XG2560 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2560 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: ViewSonic XG2560 leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
ViewSonic XG2560
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | ViewSonic XG2560 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 8 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or ViewSonic XG2560 better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and ViewSonic XG2560 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2560 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: ViewSonic XG2560 leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2560 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).