Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Xiaomi Redmi Display 30 RMMNT30HFCW
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSXiaomi Redmi Display 30 RMMNT30HFCW
30″ · 2560×1080 · 200 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Xiaomi Redmi Display 30 RMMNT30HFCW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: Xiaomi Redmi Display 30 RMMNT30HFCW leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Display 30 RMMNT30HFCW
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | Xiaomi Redmi Display 30 RMMNT30HFCW | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 30″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Xiaomi Redmi Display 30 RMMNT30HFCW better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Xiaomi Redmi Display 30 RMMNT30HFCW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: Xiaomi Redmi Display 30 RMMNT30HFCW leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Xiaomi Redmi Display 30 RMMNT30HFCW leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).