Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144-A
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32UHD144-A
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSOn specs, Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 comes out ahead: a gear score of 79 versus 73 for Corsair XENEON 32UHD144-A.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32UHD144-A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (5 ms vs 12 ms).
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32UHD144-A
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | Corsair XENEON 32UHD144-A | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 73 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 12 ms |
| ≈ $700 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 or Corsair XENEON 32UHD144-A better?
On specs, Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 comes out ahead: a gear score of 79 versus 73 for Corsair XENEON 32UHD144-A. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32UHD144-A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (5 ms vs 12 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).