Dell P2815Q vs Philips 240B9/00
Dell P2815Q
28″ · 3840×2160 · 30 Hz · TNPhilips 240B9/00
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 75 Hz · IPSDell P2815Q and Philips 240B9/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50.
- Resolution: Dell P2815Q leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1200).
- Refresh rate: Philips 240B9/00 leads (75 Hz vs 30 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 240B9/00 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Dell P2815Q
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 240B9/00
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Dell P2815Q | Philips 240B9/00 | |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | Gear score | 50 |
| 28″ | Screen size | 24.1″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1200 |
| 30 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| TN | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Dell P2815Q or Philips 240B9/00 better?
Dell P2815Q and Philips 240B9/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50. Resolution: Dell P2815Q leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1200). Refresh rate: Philips 240B9/00 leads (75 Hz vs 30 Hz). Response time: Philips 240B9/00 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 240B9/00 leads (75 Hz vs 30 Hz).