MSI MAG 275QF vs Philips 34M2C5601QA
MSI MAG 275QF
27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSPhilips 34M2C5601QA
34″ · 3440×1440 · 200 Hz · Fast VAMSI MAG 275QF and Philips 34M2C5601QA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.
- Resolution: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (200 Hz vs 180 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 275QF leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
MSI MAG 275QF
If you care most about response time.
Philips 34M2C5601QA
If you care most about resolution, refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MAG 275QF | Philips 34M2C5601QA | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 79 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast VA |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $200 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MAG 275QF or Philips 34M2C5601QA better?
MSI MAG 275QF and Philips 34M2C5601QA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79. Resolution: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (200 Hz vs 180 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 275QF leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (200 Hz vs 180 Hz).