Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 vs Philips 34M2C5601QA
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSPhilips 34M2C5601QA
34″ · 3440×1440 · 200 Hz · Fast VACorsair XENEON 32QHD240 and Philips 34M2C5601QA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.
- Resolution: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 200 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 34M2C5601QA
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | Philips 34M2C5601QA | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 79 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $700 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 or Philips 34M2C5601QA better?
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 and Philips 34M2C5601QA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79. Resolution: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 200 Hz). Response time: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 200 Hz).