MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD vs Philips 34M2C5601QA
MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · VAPhilips 34M2C5601QA
34″ · 3440×1440 · 200 Hz · Fast VAMSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD and Philips 34M2C5601QA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.
- Resolution: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD leads (240 Hz vs 200 Hz).
MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 34M2C5601QA
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD | Philips 34M2C5601QA | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 79 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| VA | Panel | Fast VA |
| — | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $600 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD or Philips 34M2C5601QA better?
MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD and Philips 34M2C5601QA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79. Resolution: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD leads (240 Hz vs 200 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD leads (240 Hz vs 200 Hz).