Monitors / Comparison

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs Samsung SF350

Monitor · Samsung

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA

32″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 39.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time30
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung SF350

22″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 39.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time60
Verdict

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA and Samsung SF350 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39.

  • Response time: Samsung SF350 leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this

Samsung SF350

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZASamsung SF350
39Gear score39
32″Screen size22″
1920×1080Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
VAPanelTN
8 msResponse time4 ms
≈ $210Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA or Samsung SF350 better?

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA and Samsung SF350 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39. Response time: Samsung SF350 leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).

Similar comparisons

Samsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs ASUS ML228HSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs ASUS ML238HSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs ASUS ML248HSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs BenQ BL2400PUSamsung LS32AM500NNXZA vs BenQ BL2485TCSamsung SF350 vs ASUS ML228HSamsung SF350 vs ASUS ML238HSamsung SF350 vs ASUS ML248HSamsung SF350 vs BenQ BL2400PUSamsung SF350 vs BenQ BL2485TC