Monitors / Comparison
Samsung S22A350H vs Samsung SF350
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung S22A350H
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TN · 2011Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time78
Recency20
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung SF350
22″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TNEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time60
Verdict
Samsung S22A350H and Samsung SF350 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39.
- Response time: Samsung S22A350H leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Pick this
Samsung S22A350H
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung S22A350H | Samsung SF350 | |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | Gear score | 39 |
| 21.5″ | Screen size | 22″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | TN |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| 2011 | Release year | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung S22A350H or Samsung SF350 better?
Samsung S22A350H and Samsung SF350 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39. Response time: Samsung S22A350H leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Similar comparisons
Samsung S22A350H vs ASUS ML228HSamsung S22A350H vs ASUS ML238HSamsung S22A350H vs ASUS ML248HSamsung S22A350H vs BenQ BL2400PUSamsung S22A350H vs BenQ BL2485TCSamsung SF350 vs ASUS ML228HSamsung SF350 vs ASUS ML238HSamsung SF350 vs ASUS ML248HSamsung SF350 vs BenQ BL2400PUSamsung SF350 vs BenQ BL2485TC