Attack Shark R11 Ultra vs Lamzu Inca
Attack Shark R11 Ultra
49 g · PAW3950 Max · WirelessLamzu Inca
40 g · PAW3950 · WirelessAttack Shark R11 Ultra and Lamzu Inca are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- Lamzu Inca is 9 g lighter (40 g vs 49 g).
- Max DPI: Attack Shark R11 Ultra leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Attack Shark R11 Ultra
If you care most about max DPI.
Lamzu Inca
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Attack Shark R11 Ultra | Lamzu Inca | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 49 g | Weight | 40 g |
| PAW3950 Max | Sensor | PAW3950 |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 30,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Attack Shark R11 Ultra or Lamzu Inca better?
Attack Shark R11 Ultra and Lamzu Inca are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Lamzu Inca is 9 g lighter (40 g vs 49 g). Max DPI: Attack Shark R11 Ultra leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Which one is lighter?
Lamzu Inca is 9 g lighter (40 g vs 49 g).