Compare / GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 290X
GTX 1650 vs R9 290X: which is better?
GeForce GTX 1650 is about 12% faster than Radeon R9 290X in games (1080p · high settings · Ryzen 5 7600). Radeon R9 290X offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: GeForce GTX 1650Cheaper: Radeon R9 290XValue: Radeon R9 290X
Head to head
6%
Gaming performance
5%
27/100
Part score
25/100
87 FPS
Average FPS
78 FPS
≈ $176 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $72 (used)
47/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 290X | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Board power | 75 W | 290 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 450 W | ≥ 650 W |
| AI upscaling | FSR | FSR |
| Ray tracing | No | No |
| Release year | 2019 | 2013 |
GeForce GTX 1650: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Radeon R9 290X: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
GeForce GTX 1650Radeon R9 290X
87average FPS
78average FPS