Compare / Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1060
R9 Nano vs GTX 1060: which is better?
GeForce GTX 1060 is about 4% faster than Radeon R9 Nano in games (1440p · high settings · Ryzen 7 9800X3D). Radeon R9 Nano offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: GeForce GTX 1060Value: Radeon R9 Nano
Head to head
7%
Gaming performance
7%
30/100
Part score
29/100
71 FPS
Average FPS
74 FPS
≈ $112 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $112 (used)
100/100
Value for money
96/100
Specifications
| Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce GTX 1060 | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 4 GB | 3 / 6 GB |
| Board power | 175 W | 120 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 550 W | ≥ 450 W |
| AI upscaling | FSR | FSR |
| Ray tracing | No | No |
| Release year | 2015 | 2016 |
Radeon R9 Nano: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
GeForce GTX 1060: 3 / 6 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Radeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 1060
71average FPS
74average FPS