Compare / Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 980
R9 Nano vs GTX 980: which is better?
Radeon R9 Nano and GeForce GTX 980 perform almost the same in games (4K · high settings · Ryzen 7 9800X3D). GeForce GTX 980 offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: GeForce GTX 980Value: GeForce GTX 980
Head to head
7%
Gaming performance
6%
30/100
Part score
28/100
36 FPS
Average FPS
35 FPS
≈ $112 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $96 (used)
97/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce GTX 980 | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Board power | 175 W | 165 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 550 W | ≥ 500 W |
| AI upscaling | FSR | FSR |
| Ray tracing | No | No |
| Release year | 2015 | 2014 |
Radeon R9 Nano: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
GeForce GTX 980: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Radeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 980
36average FPS
35average FPS