Monitors / Comparison

ACI ROG PG279Q vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV

Monitor · ACI

ACI ROG PG279Q

2560×1440 · 144 Hz
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution80
VS
Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV

27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 70.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
Verdict

ACI ROG PG279Q and ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ACI ROG PG279QASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
70Gear score70
—Screen size27″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
144 HzRefresh rate144 Hz
—PanelIPS
—Response time5 ms
—Estimated price≈ $359
3Setups using it0

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Average setup score of people using these: 70.8 What’s yours?

FAQ

Is ACI ROG PG279Q or ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV better?

ACI ROG PG279Q and ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.