ACI ROG PG279Q vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSACI ROG PG279Q and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ACI ROG PG279Q | Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| — | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| — | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 8 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $350 |
| 3 | Setups using it | 0 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Average setup score of people using these: 70.8 What’s yours?
FAQ
Is ACI ROG PG279Q or Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 better?
ACI ROG PG279Q and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).