ACI ROG PG279Q vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSACI ROG PG279Q and ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ACI ROG PG279Q leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
ACI ROG PG279Q
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ACI ROG PG279Q | ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| — | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| — | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 2 ms |
| 3 | Setups using it | 0 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Average setup score of people using these: 70.8 What’s yours?
FAQ
Is ACI ROG PG279Q or ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV better?
ACI ROG PG279Q and ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ACI ROG PG279Q leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ACI ROG PG279Q leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).