AOC 27G4HA vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144
AOC 27G4HA
27″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · Fast IPSCorsair XENEON 32UHD144
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSAOC 27G4HA and Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: AOC 27G4HA leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: AOC 27G4HA leads (1 ms vs 12 ms).
AOC 27G4HA
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32UHD144
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC 27G4HA | Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 200 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 12 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC 27G4HA or Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 better?
AOC 27G4HA and Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: AOC 27G4HA leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: AOC 27G4HA leads (1 ms vs 12 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC 27G4HA leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).