AOC Q3279VWF vs Philips 271V8LAB
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VAPhilips 271V8LAB
27″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · VAAOC Q3279VWF and Philips 271V8LAB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: AOC Q3279VWF leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 271V8LAB leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 271V8LAB leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 271V8LAB
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | Philips 271V8LAB | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or Philips 271V8LAB better?
AOC Q3279VWF and Philips 271V8LAB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: AOC Q3279VWF leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 271V8LAB leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz). Response time: Philips 271V8LAB leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 271V8LAB leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).