Monitors / Comparison

AOC Q3279VWF vs Philips 326E8FJSB

Monitor · AOC

AOC Q3279VWF

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 52.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate25
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Philips

Philips 326E8FJSB

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 52.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate25
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time50
Verdict

AOC Q3279VWF and Philips 326E8FJSB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.

Spec-by-spec comparison

AOC Q3279VWFPhilips 326E8FJSB
52Gear score52
31.5″Screen size31.5″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
75 HzRefresh rate75 Hz
VAPanelVA
5 msResponse time5 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is AOC Q3279VWF or Philips 326E8FJSB better?

AOC Q3279VWF and Philips 326E8FJSB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.

Similar comparisons

AOC Q3279VWF vs MSI PRO MP223 E2AOC Q3279VWF vs MSI PRO MP225VAOC Q3279VWF vs MSI Pro MP2412AOC Q3279VWF vs BenQ SW242QAOC Q3279VWF vs AOC U3277PWQUPhilips 326E8FJSB vs MSI PRO MP223 E2Philips 326E8FJSB vs MSI PRO MP225VPhilips 326E8FJSB vs MSI Pro MP2412Philips 326E8FJSB vs BenQ SW242QPhilips 326E8FJSB vs Samsung FT872