AOC Q3279VWF vs Philips 349X7FJEW/27
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VAPhilips 349X7FJEW/27
34″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · VAAOC Q3279VWF and Philips 349X7FJEW/27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Philips 349X7FJEW/27 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 349X7FJEW/27 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 349X7FJEW/27
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | Philips 349X7FJEW/27 | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or Philips 349X7FJEW/27 better?
AOC Q3279VWF and Philips 349X7FJEW/27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Philips 349X7FJEW/27 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips 349X7FJEW/27 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).