ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27QRT2A vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144
ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27QRT2A
27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 32UHD144
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSASRock Phantom Gaming PG27QRT2A and Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27QRT2A leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27QRT2A
If you care most about refresh rate.
Corsair XENEON 32UHD144
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27QRT2A | Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 12 ms |
| ≈ $164 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27QRT2A or Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 better?
ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27QRT2A and Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27QRT2A leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27QRT2A leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).