ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC vs Philips 34M1C5500VA
ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · VAPhilips 34M1C5500VA
34″ · 3440×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ROG Strix XG32VC and Philips 34M1C5500VA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: Philips 34M1C5500VA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 34M1C5500VA
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC | Philips 34M1C5500VA | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC or Philips 34M1C5500VA better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC and Philips 34M1C5500VA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: Philips 34M1C5500VA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).