ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM vs Philips 34M1C5500VA
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 280 Hz · TNPhilips 34M1C5500VA
34″ · 3440×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM and Philips 34M1C5500VA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: Philips 34M1C5500VA leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (0.5 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Philips 34M1C5500VA
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM | Philips 34M1C5500VA | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 280 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM or Philips 34M1C5500VA better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM and Philips 34M1C5500VA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: Philips 34M1C5500VA leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (0.5 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM leads (280 Hz vs 165 Hz).