ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs Philips 34M1C5500VA
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSPhilips 34M1C5500VA
34″ · 3440×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and Philips 34M1C5500VA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: Philips 34M1C5500VA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Response time: Philips 34M1C5500VA leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Philips 34M1C5500VA
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV | Philips 34M1C5500VA | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $550 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV or Philips 34M1C5500VA better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and Philips 34M1C5500VA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: Philips 34M1C5500VA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Response time: Philips 34M1C5500VA leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).