MSI G271CQP E2 vs Philips 34M1C5500VA
Philips 34M1C5500VA
34″ · 3440×1440 · 165 Hz · VAMSI G271CQP E2 and Philips 34M1C5500VA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: Philips 34M1C5500VA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI G271CQP E2 leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
MSI G271CQP E2
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 34M1C5500VA
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI G271CQP E2 | Philips 34M1C5500VA | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $245 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI G271CQP E2 or Philips 34M1C5500VA better?
MSI G271CQP E2 and Philips 34M1C5500VA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: Philips 34M1C5500VA leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI G271CQP E2 leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G271CQP E2 leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).