ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q vs Philips 27E1N8900
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · IPSPhilips 27E1N8900
27″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q and Philips 27E1N8900 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: Philips 27E1N8900 leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 27E1N8900
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q | Philips 27E1N8900 | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 5 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q or Philips 27E1N8900 better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q and Philips 27E1N8900 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: Philips 27E1N8900 leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).