ASUS TUF GAMING VG247Q1A vs Philips 27E1N8900
ASUS TUF GAMING VG247Q1A
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · VAPhilips 27E1N8900
27″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDASUS TUF GAMING VG247Q1A and Philips 27E1N8900 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: Philips 27E1N8900 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF GAMING VG247Q1A leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).
ASUS TUF GAMING VG247Q1A
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 27E1N8900
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF GAMING VG247Q1A | Philips 27E1N8900 | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | OLED |
| ≈ $149 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF GAMING VG247Q1A or Philips 27E1N8900 better?
ASUS TUF GAMING VG247Q1A and Philips 27E1N8900 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: Philips 27E1N8900 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF GAMING VG247Q1A leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF GAMING VG247Q1A leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).