BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N vs Philips 27E1N8900
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · VAPhilips 27E1N8900
27″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDBenQ MOBIUZ EX240N and Philips 27E1N8900 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: Philips 27E1N8900 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 27E1N8900
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N | Philips 27E1N8900 | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | OLED |
| 4 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $140 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N or Philips 27E1N8900 better?
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N and Philips 27E1N8900 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: Philips 27E1N8900 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ MOBIUZ EX240N leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).