BenQ XR3501 vs Philips 27E1N8900
BenQ XR3501
35″ · 2560×1080 · 144 Hz · VAPhilips 27E1N8900
27″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDBenQ XR3501 and Philips 27E1N8900 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: Philips 27E1N8900 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ XR3501 leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
BenQ XR3501
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 27E1N8900
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ XR3501 | Philips 27E1N8900 | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 35″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | OLED |
| 4 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ XR3501 or Philips 27E1N8900 better?
BenQ XR3501 and Philips 27E1N8900 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: Philips 27E1N8900 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ XR3501 leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ XR3501 leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).