ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A vs Philips 25M2N5200U
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 310 Hz · Fast IPSPhilips 25M2N5200U
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 390 Hz · Fast IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A and Philips 25M2N5200U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 81.
- Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200U leads (390 Hz vs 310 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A
If you care most about response time.
Philips 25M2N5200U
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A | Philips 25M2N5200U | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 81 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 310 Hz | Refresh rate | 390 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A or Philips 25M2N5200U better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A and Philips 25M2N5200U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 81. Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200U leads (390 Hz vs 310 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QMR5A leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200U leads (390 Hz vs 310 Hz).