BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R vs Philips 498P9Z
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R
34″ · 3440×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSPhilips 498P9Z
48.8″ · 5120×1440 · 165 Hz · VABenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R and Philips 498P9Z are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.
- Resolution: Philips 498P9Z leads (5120×1440 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 498P9Z leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R
If you care most about response time.
Philips 498P9Z
If you care most about resolution, refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R | Philips 498P9Z | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 75 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 48.8″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R or Philips 498P9Z better?
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R and Philips 498P9Z are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75. Resolution: Philips 498P9Z leads (5120×1440 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 498P9Z leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3415R leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 498P9Z leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).