LG 38GN95B-B vs Philips 34M2C5601QA
LG 38GN95B-B
37.5″ · 3840×1600 · 160 Hz · IPSPhilips 34M2C5601QA
34″ · 3440×1440 · 200 Hz · Fast VALG 38GN95B-B and Philips 34M2C5601QA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.
- Resolution: LG 38GN95B-B leads (3840×1600 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (200 Hz vs 160 Hz).
LG 38GN95B-B
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 34M2C5601QA
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 38GN95B-B | Philips 34M2C5601QA | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 79 |
| 37.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3840×1600 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 160 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 38GN95B-B or Philips 34M2C5601QA better?
LG 38GN95B-B and Philips 34M2C5601QA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79. Resolution: LG 38GN95B-B leads (3840×1600 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (200 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (200 Hz vs 160 Hz).